🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a direct response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use immobilized Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Russian frozen financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. It has threatened reciprocal actions, including seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are developing measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also designing safeguards to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also sends a powerful message that if you cause all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."